top of page

No Conflict, They SAid

In Australia and around the world, legislation is being introduced that replaces sex with gender identity. Advocates insist that there is no conflict of interest. But governments are not collecting data on the impacts of this legislative change. We're worried about the impacts on women of men using women-only spaces, including but not limited to: changing rooms, fitting rooms, bathrooms, shelters, rape and domestic violence refuges, gyms, spas, sports, schools, accommodations, hospital wards, shortlists, prizes, quotas, political groups, prisons, clubs, events, festivals, dating apps, and language. If we can't collect data, we can at least collect stories. Please tell us how your use of women-only spaces has been impacted. All stories will be published anonymously. If you know of other women who have been impacted, please encourage them to tell their stories too.

This site is run from Australia, New Zealand members of the LGB Defence, AWW Inc. and supported by LGB Alliance.

AWW logo.png
LGB_LOGO_WHITE.png
  • @ConflictSaid
  • Writer: anonymous woman
    anonymous woman
  • Apr 8, 2021
  • 2 min read

I organised a women's self-defence event a few years ago. On the day of the event several young women of university age attended. They all had slight/slim builds (this makes sense as these women are likely to feel even more vulnerable to violence from larger males and so would seek self defence training).


Two transwomen also attended, wearing very inappropriate clothing for a sports-type event (skirt, dress, dolly/ballerina type flat shoes). They both had a large build and were in their 30s. One of the transwomen had his wig in his hand, exposing his very obvious male-pattern baldness.


I spoke to the other organiser and we agreed that we were unfortunately not in a position to turn the transwomen away as the venue was extremely 'woke'. We also felt that risking the whole event being cancelled would deprive the female attendees of the chance to learn some self-defence skills and so proceeded with the event with the transwomen participating.

When attendees were asked to pair up, the two transwomen (who attended together) sought to pair up with other female attendees despite the very obvious massive disparity in height and weight. I stepped in to put the group into pairs with individuals of a similar height and weight in order to prevent the transwomen injuring female partners.


The instructor spent a few minutes talking about striking (punching) which the pairs then practiced with each other by holding pads. The instructor moved on, saying that due to anatomical sex difference, punching is rarely an effective self-defence technique for women. Despite moving on to practicing other techniques which are more effective for females, the two transwomen continued to practice throwing punches, even grunting whilst doing so.


Despite myself trying to manage the event tactfully, the presence of males at a women's self-defence event (which was so specifically aimed at females being able to use techniques which would offset the size, strength and weight of a male attacker) was very uncomfortable, posed a range of practical issues, and was certainly an elephant in the room.


As expected, none of the young women passed comment on their presence but dutifully got on with it... as women are conditioned to do!


  • Writer: anonymous woman
    anonymous woman
  • Apr 8, 2021
  • 1 min read

I'm a high school teacher. On one occasion, some boys in my form group (aged 15/16) disclosed to me that they felt extremely uncomfortable using the toilets whilst a trans pupil (female identifying as male) was present in them. They were not being derogatory or callous but felt that it was an invasion of their privacy. They said that they avoided using the toilet at break times and had started going during lesson time instead (thus losing out on learning time).


They also felt uncomfortable about it because they recognised that it's an intimidating situation for a girl to be surrounded by boys in the toilets and that it just didn't feel right to them to 'expose' themselves to a girl. They knew instinctively that men exposing themselves can intimidate women or make them uncomfortable. Just because a female pupil identified as a male, this did not remove their moral instinct to not make her uncomfortable.


The discomfort was two-fold. They were concerned for their privacy and dignity but they also felt as though it was forcing them to do something which went against their moral code.


  • Writer: anonymous woman
    anonymous woman
  • Apr 7, 2021
  • 1 min read

I play women's cricket at a high level. One of the opposition players is a 6 ft 2 male who opens the bowling and bats in the upper order, with enormous power. This is both unfair, and dangerous.


Cricket Australia have a ridiculous policy regarding this, that so long as someone "identifies" as a woman, they can not only play, but have FULL access to facilities i.e. showers and changerooms.


Some of the girls in our team are very young and impressionable. How is it reasonable that they should be exposed to a man in the changerooms?


I have heard this same type of story innumerable times from other sports where the presiding bodies are too scared of being called transphobic to protect the actual women playing the sport.


Sadly, I also know of women walking away from sport for this very reason.


bottom of page